Asus P7P55D Deluxe Review

September 9, 2009 | 11:50

Tags: #analysis #crossfire #deluxe #detail #mobo #motherboard #p55 #p7p55d #pictures #result #review #sli

Companies: #asus #test

Crysis

Publisher: Electronic Arts

We tested the game using the 64-bit executable under and DirectX 10 with the 1.21 patch applied. We used a custom time demo recorded on the Harbour map which is more representative of gameplay than the built-in benchmark that renders things much faster than you're going to experience in game.

For our testing, we set all the settings to High. Because of how intense the game is, we tested with both anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering disabled at resolutions above 1,680 x 1,050 for the time being. There is currently no support for anisotropic filtering in the game, but you can still force it from the driver control panel.

Crysis

1680x1050 2xAA 0xAF, All High Settings, Zotac GeForce GTX 260 AMP!

  • MSI P55 GD65
  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
    • 34.0
    • 23.7
    • 33.5
    • 21.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

Crysis (CrossFireX)

1680x1050 2xAA 0xAF, All High Settings, Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 1GB Toxic

  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
  • MSI P55 GD65
    • 41.3
    • 26.5
    • 39.0
    • 23.0
0
10
20
30
40
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

Crysis (SLI)

1680x1050 2xAA 0xAF, All High Settings, Zotac GeForce GTX 260 AMP!

  • MSI P55 GD65
  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
    • 50.4
    • 29.9
    • 47.6
    • 28.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

Crysis performance is back and forth between the two boards across the single and multi-GPU tests at stock speeds. Out of the three scenarios the Asus only draws a clear lead with ATI cards installed, however there's not much in it between the two.

Far Cry 2

Publisher: Ubisoft

Far Cry 2 is the latest first person shooter from Ubisoft, and while it continues the Far Cry franchise that Crytek started in 2004, this game is built on its own in-house engine and has no association - other than its name - to anything Crytek has worked on or is working on now. We used a retail version of the game patched to version 1.02, and used the in-built "Action" gameplay demo set to Ultra-Very High settings under DirectX 10.

Far Cry 2

1680x1050 DX10 0xAA 0xAF, UItra High Settings, Zotac GeForce GTX 260 AMP!

  • MSI P55 GD65
  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
    • 48.1
    • 38.8
    • 46.9
    • 39.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

Far Cry 2 (CrossFireX)

1680x1050 DX10 0xAA 0xAF, UItra High Settings, Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 1GB Toxic

  • MSI P55 GD65
  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
    • 48.1
    • 38.8
    • 46.0
    • 39.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

Far Cry 2 (SLI)

1680x1050 DX10 0xAA 0xAF, UItra High Settings, Zotac GeForce GTX 260 AMP!

  • MSI P55 GD65
  • Asus P7P55 Deluxe
    • 57.8
    • 46.6
    • 56.6
    • 46.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Frames Per Second - higher is better
  • Average
  • Minimum

In Far Cry 2 the MSI is slightly consistently faster average FPS, however the Asus board gives a marginally smoother experience with a higher minimum in every situation. The differences are again minimal though.
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by flibblesan - Wed Sep 09 2009 11:39

Wow, surprising review as I would have expected this to have been better than the cheaper MSI board and not the other way round. So when are you guys reviewing the MSI board?

Posted by Guest-16 - Wed Sep 09 2009 11:49

Right as I type. :)

Posted by mi1ez - Wed Sep 09 2009 11:58

I completely agree with the pricing. I'm going i5, probably by christmas, and I'm not paying that much for my board! Good review as normal though, Can't wait to see all the upcoming P55 reviews.

Posted by wyx087 - Wed Sep 09 2009 12:43

wow £165, very nice pricing, for me at least :p
not looking at the value score, it's a fantastic board :)

the turbo remote is completely useless apart from the ON button and clear-CMOS. since i overclocked by changing memory multiplier and timing, went in to save the profile, then went back to stock, loaded up Windows and tryed to use the key, but it froze. seems like the TurboV program doesn't save anything other than Bclk and a few simple voltages. also, as you said, the animation feels laggy and slow.

so is 200 Bclk the highest you've achieved? i was expecting a little higher....... also, for i5 750, highest configurable multiplier is 21x.

for BIOS, my one came with the one before 0504, not sure what other people got. but just a note for other comp. winners.

from personal experience, would have preferred the "target voltage" option in the BIOS, especially for CPU offset mode. other than that, fantastic board, really stable and easy to overclock.
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.